TOP H4831 VS H4831SC SECRETS

Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets

Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets

Blog Article

I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I actually need to locate a bullet during the 160 class that my more mature rifle likes.

When it comes to bench relaxation matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted much more wins than all other propellants merged. A great extruded powder, it flows correctly and effortlessly by way of actions and provides match-quality accuracy when place to make use of.

The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is exactly why you are looking at better velocities acquired with that powder, as opposed to That which you've found Along with the IMR stuff. Also superior powder, but considerably greater suited to somewhat lesser conditions by using a little bit considerably less capacity.

Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or typical) and ton you're employing while. Same burn price does not imply it will behave "precisely" the identical. I've observed above one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

some cartridges are likely copper foul greater than Other individuals although, irrespective of how easy the end is about the bore and call for cleansing on the copper fouling more typically.

I have employed H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any variance. The one thing could be the shorter cut gives you a little more space. Great luck!gun)

I do not like to operate up a load utilizing just one large amount of powder and afterwards have to work up yet again simply because I operate out and possess to start employing a new great deal variety.

The SC or SSC selected powders Commonly let for larger h4831 vs h4831sc load density, so that you can ordinarily get a little bit extra powder in a very provided case when working with compressed loads. Utilization of a fall tube can even more improve this edge.

dioni.a.312 claimed: In my expertise the only real genuine variance is that the shortcut meters far better as a result of reloading tools. The moment It is loaded theres no useful change. I've listened to which the shortcut may have a very small little bit more quickly burn off level but it seems insignificant. Click to increase...

locutus reported: I continue to have a very good stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by way of my powder measures smoothly.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're fully unique powders, with IMR 4831 remaining substantially more quickly when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Don't handle them as precisely the same powder, because they most surely are certainly not.

Like Anyone claimed, the SC stands for “brief Slash” which is a little bit much easier to meter. Can make you query why they might even now make the typical just one.

I commonly constantly get the sc Model. Using a powder measure it hangs up fewer on account of shorter kernels and I believe makes it possible for much more reliable metering so much less time you are taking trickling in the last bit of demand to create fat. So essentially the SC saves you situations

I sawed a single in fifty percent to determine how thick the jackets had been, and they were effortlessly twice as thick as a fifty-grain hollow position was. Ditto to the 64-grain Energy Point, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie pet dogs h4831sc load data or woodchucks. You now know anything I find out about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know nearly anything h4831 vs h4831sc in any way in regards to the 223. I doubt that you are going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.

Report this page